Welcome to the yowLAB Film Festival discussion for our second film, Microtopia, directed by Jesper Wachtmeister. Our reviewer this month is yowLAB co-director Jeff Salmon. His review/synopsis is included below.
- If you have not yet watched the film, it is available for online rental through vimeo.
- To contribute to the discussion, please feel free to use the comment section following the review.
- You are also welcome to post links to your own reviews if you prefer to publish on your blog or website. Please make sure to link to this page on your end.
- We also welcome guest contributions. Please contact us at email@example.com if you would like to submit a review to be posted to the yowLAB blog.
- Or tweet your comments @yow_LAB #yowLABFilmFest
We hope you enjoy the film and the discussion. Without further ado. . .
Microtopia provides an interesting look at individuals, primarily artists and architects, who have decided to downsize their life. I say this because for the people in the film it is clear that micro-living is a lifestyle decision. As each person describes their personal reasons for exploring or living a micro-lifestyle some reoccurring ideas start to emerge, the strongest of which is an escape from imposed social and economic pressures.
In this quest for freedom, most of the people featured are exploring nomadic shelters. One of the characteristics of that seems inherent to these nomadic shelters is a sense of connected isolation. This seems to be a reflection of the people, as most admit to liking people but at a distance. John Wells, for example, lives in almost total isolation however enjoys his online connection to others through is webcam and blog. This sentiment is echoed throughout the film as many of the people describe a hope for technology and a reliance on it for connectivity. If we distill this down to its essence we need two things in life: shelter and an internet connection.
This freedom is certainly attractive to the people in the film however what is does really touch on is the reality of increasing populations in urban centres with limited housing. What the film presents is a more utopian and nomadic vision of micro-shelters which is hard to relate to. In cities like New York where the cost of housing is extremely high people have adapted to micro-living more so out of necessity. It would have also been interesting to see a couple or family who are living micro.
Whether you are looking at nomadic micro-shelters or urban micro-apartments the question at the core of the film is relevant: how much do you need? How much do you need to feel connected to others? How much comfort do you need? What will it take for you to be happy? This will be different for everyone.
This is probably best articulated by Jay Shafer in the film when he is discussing his kitchen (his very very small kitchen) when he describes the design process as prioritizing function. He does not cook a lot, therefore he does not need a big kitchen, however if he did, perhaps he would consider making his entire home the kitchen. To this end Jennifer Siegal, the first person shown in the film, provides an excellent idiom about the living micro – “it is less about bigger is better and more about smaller is smarter.”
Below I have summarized a few sections to show the variety of characters and ideas presented in the film.
Jay Shafer. Graton, Northern California.
Jay is the second person we are introduced to in the film and if probably one of the most charming. It opens with him describing beauty as what is necessary, and when something is necessary it has vitality. Currently living in his fourth tiny house, he describes his goal to contribute as little as possible to the energy and environmental consumption common to housing yet have a great place to live. One of the most interesting topics that he touches on is conflict between building code requirements and micro-housing. The building code stipulates minimum room sizes that would be larger than he needs however by putting the house on wheels it is no longer classified as a house and doesn’t have to adhere to building code.
Richart Sowa, Artist. Isla Mujeres, Mexico.
Richart has set out on one of the most ambitious mirco-housing projects – he has constructed an island using shipping pallets kept afloat using with bags of plastic bottles beneath them. His goal is to make this island big enough that it can go out on the ocean, through the Panama Canal and ultimately out onto the Pacific Ocean. His interest is largely ecological as he notes there are many ways to recycle to make a wonderful home – where we take trash and turn it into something that is actually beneficial to the planet.
Stephane Malka, Architect. Paris, France.
Stephane is one of the few people in the film looking who addresses the urban condition with his conceptual projects. He states that with the web there is now the potential to be all together but be by yourself. He describes housing as a closet that has become sentimental because everything that you have in a house you can have elsewhere. In the city you do not need to cook because you can eat better at a restaurant. Similarly, you can bath better at a spa than you could at home.
His proposal for La Defence, Paris, creates a city within the city using already manufactured objects and attaching them to the existing architecture like a parasite. With this in mind he says that it is more about the strategy than the form – taking pre-fab units that can fit into the existing fabric and then begin to grow into a city within the city.
Ana Rewakowicz, Artist. Montreal, Canada.
Ana is the last person featured in the film and the one who has sought to simplify the idea of home/shelter the most. Her creation, the Sleeping Bag Dress is a form of self-sufficient wearable architecture. When it is inflated it form a cylindrical shelter which someone can sleep in.
Her experiences moving from country to country form the basis for her nomadic creation. She goes on to describe the modern nomad as someone who “doesn’t get stuck in particular structures” and with that comes a certain open mindedness. This is a fitting description for most of the people in the film as it seems that they are trying to avoid imposed structures in one way or another.
note: all images included above are screenshots captured from Microtopia